In what might seem like a strange concept, filmed theatre performances are growing in popularity. When they were trialed on the Camden Fringe Festival they received about 500 viewers per show. The shows composed of plays, dance and comedy and reportedly 5-7% of people said they'd be prepared to purchase the privilege in future.
Some theatre producers are already seizing the oppurtunity to place recordings of these performances online, in addition to rehearsal footage as well as 'trailers' for brand new plays. Here เลือดใหม่พันธุ์มังกร ซับไทย between theatre and film become interchangeble inside the complete deficiency of 'live' setting which can be arguably why people watch plays not films. But the research study of the Camden Fringe tells an alternative story of people who are prepared to see something new and unusual online.
When something is filmed 'live' it could be edited and saved for additional viewings whilst still retaining its energy and spontaneity. Stand-up comics regularly film their performances with some cameras, edit rid of it and then put it to DVD with good results. Other types of performance might not transcend so well, especially much more serious drama that will require a believbility that you will find removed from the containment of a screen. When viewers are used to seeing drama filmed on-location then it might also seem flat in the theatre setting.
Gauging with the availability of recent shows such as Strictly Come Dancing and Glee! , the more glitzy and spectacular kinds of theatre may transfer safer to smaller screen. Musical theatre particularly would film well since it is a very visual medium providing treats for your eyes and ears plus the soul.
The reality of installing technical equipment and requiring actors to wear mics may limit some smaller theatres' chance to produce these shows well. The cost involved might be a better investment of these theatres compared to larger ones though, because it is often smaller theatres with riskier productions and much less well-known actors that fight to fill seats.
The Pilot theatre in York has grasped this concept with their Pilot Live Project, which streams live performances to get a 'virtual box office' fee. The immediacy of live streaming may seem advantageous because of this new medium's appeal but has to be shame for it to be so time-restricted when almost all other media might be accessed on-demand. Plus due to the lots of media that's accessible free of charge, legally or otherwise, it might discourage potential real box-office takers who may also use the experience to try-before-they-buy.
For example, the TED technology, entertainment and design lectures were originally purely available by ticket holders who pay thousands to view some of the leading thinkers from worldwide spread their ideas. Then the founders thought we would film every one of the lectures and set them online, for free. They have their unique Youtube channel and still have found simply because this sharing of these work the true talks are actually selling-out faster than ever before. The Royal Society of Arts has followed suit, but added animated 'illustrations' with their lectures that actually enhance the audience's understanding with the talk.
There is real potential for this idea to advertise the live arts when it's done well. The idea of charging because of it may not sit well with viewers utilized to free media elsewhere, but a 'pay-what-you-want' scheme like many performers use perform effectively. Either way, other 'live' arts already are doing the work with good results. Moving using the times could seriously help theatre gained popularity within the real world and also the online one.